5

Luke Angel Banned From America: Barack Obama Email Scandal

Posted on 19 September 2010 by pinoytutorial

The United States’ Federal Bureau of Investigation may take upon itself the reputation of taking things as serious business. Well they have all the reasons and the obligation to do so anyway. Because of this, an angry e-mail from a drunken teenage boy addressed to the President of the United States, Barack Obama,  is definitely something that should not be an exception to the strict security implementations of the said agency.

luke angel barack obama Luke Angel Banned From America: Barack Obama Email Scandal

Luke Angel, a 17-year old British resident from Silsoe, Bedfordshire, was banned from entering and stepping into the U.S. grounds (for life) after reportedly sending a “threatening” email and embarrassing remark to President Barack Obama. This boy used the word “prick” to address the United States leader. Angel was said to have been angered and became upset after watching a documentary about the 9/11 attack of the Twin Towers. The boy was said to be under the influence of alcohol while watching the said show.

It has been a custom and common measure for government officials and agencies especially those that are directly involved with national security to check and monitor e-mails that may or may not be directly addressed to government offices and officials. This act is done in order to detect possible security threats and stop any danger as soon as possible. Just last year in Colombia, a man was arrested after announcing in Facebook that he is promising to kill the son of Colombian President Alvaro Uribe, Jeronimo Alberto Uribe.

After intercepting the e-mail sent by Angel, the FBI didn’t hesitate to make swift actions—they immediately called the local British police from the boy’s hometown. The police then went to the Angel’s residence, took photographs of the boy and broke the news that he is forever banned from entering the United States from then on.

Angel doesn’t seem to care about it, however. He didn’t deny the accusation though, instead he claimed that he was drunk and could actually have called President Obama a prick, but other than that,  he could not clearly remember the whole details of his gripe mail. Not being able to step into the U.S. did not pose any big deal to the boy, but he said that his parents were quite upset about it.

Now, if such a boy’s impulsive expression of his feelings should be considered by the Federal security agencies to be a big threat already, then we could put it as they are really taking things way too seriously. It is understandable though, and we could not blame them for doing such because of the various dangers posed in every nation nowadays. But, isn’t it too drastic an action to ban a boy outright from entering the country even before doing any further investigation? Well the moral is, everyone should be careful about what they post and send through and around the Web.


Share

You might also like

New Wire Act of 1961: Online Gambling Now Legal In USA Thanks To Obama
Phenom Booter Black Ops Hack: Teen Arrested For Selling Booting Tool
Barrack Obama Kill Switch: Kill The Internet In Case of Emergency on USA?
FBI Wants To ‘Wiretap’ Spy on Google, Facebook To Find Criminals
Cell Phone Jammer Controversy: Who’s To Blame? (Update)
 

Story by

Tags: , ,

5 Comments

  1. Mr. Skungeous (Reply) Posted on September 22nd, 2010 at 10:43 am

    The moral is: Yes, Virginia, there are consequences. We’d all do well to remember that before making poor decisions like taking our mothers’ SUVs drifting, setting our groins on fire with lighter fluid, or sending threatening messages to political figures. It’s time this generation exercised their brains and their discretion.

     
  2. I've forgotten i was drunk (Reply) Posted on September 23rd, 2010 at 1:07 am

    so will the ” “sharp part in the finger” be banned from the uk as well

     
  3. notme again (Reply) Posted on September 23rd, 2010 at 1:09 am

    so freedom of speech is now reserved for those telling lies only ?

     
    • Mr. Skungeous (Reply) Posted on October 20th, 2010 at 7:54 am

      Another lesson this generation needs to learn is the difference between free speech and irresponsible speech. Just because you can say something, that doesn’t mean that you should. Besides which, ‘free speech’ is severely misunderstood. Freedom of speech does not mean that you are free to run off at the mouth to anyone about anything in any manner you see fit – it refers to the right to hold and express an opinion without persecution.

       
  4. DownWithTheNewWorldOrder (Reply) Posted on July 29th, 2011 at 12:20 am

    I think that guy was right on saying that. Barrack Obama is a just figurehead used by the Builderbergs to bring in their new agenda. We really need to stand up for ourselves and make our voices heard before we end up losing all of our freedoms. After all, history is doomed to repeat itself.

     

Sensible comments/suggestions are always appreciated.

Pinoytutorial Links


Or, subscribe to us via email:


Delivered by FeedBurner